To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] Re: |
From: | gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters) |
Date: | Wed, 20 May 1998 09:03:49 +0008 |
hi all, > Transforming 100 j+0 ohms to 100k j+0 ohms by a single reactance is > seemingly a bit of a > stretch. it looks like a snap to me! i've got no resistance ("0"), a pure reactance (+j100 ohms). i want to go straight out the +imaginary axis from 100 ohms to 100k ohms. so, i add an inductor in series with the existing 100j + 0 that has a reactance of j99.9k (+0); the total is now j100k + 0, isn't it? i used a "single" reactance to transform the given impedance to the desired impedance. i think that one was too easy... what am i missing? 73, George T. Daughters, K6GT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics, Tom Rauch |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Re:, Rich Measures |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Re:, Ian White, G3SEK |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |