>Simple yet so valuable, this information. This is the opposite of the guys
>who want to squeak just 50 watts more by using a variac on both HV and
>filament to RAISE the voltage!
>Controlling filament voltage (via the primary) is a worthwhile endeavor. It
>could make your tubes into "lifetime" tubes.
>
>I can't imagine why anyone would do this in the secondary?
>
? When the amplifier has a combination hv / fil. transformer, like the
SB-200 and 2KD-5, such resistors must go in series with the fil. sec.
winding.
>I used this method (primary) with a 25 ohm 50 watt wirewound reostat in the
>primary of my old Henry 4K to lower the filament voltage on an expensive
>5CX1500A tube.
? The reported filament inrush current in the Henry 4K was 400 peak
amperes. Did you add a step-start?
>Actual numerical voltage value is not that important, I just turned it down
>to where power output dropped off and went back up about .1 or .2 volts
>(reading secondard voltage).
? This is the right way to adj. the fil. potential for a thoriated
tungsten cathode. One really doesn't need an accurate fil. voltmeter.
Howeven, this method can destroy heater/oxide-cathode type tubes.
>This also acts as an inrush current limiter as a bonus.
? ... only when the rheostat happened to be set at max. R at startup. .
A step-start always limits fil. inrush current.
- later
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|