Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] New AMP Pix

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] New AMP Pix
From: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:36:18 -0700
>
>Lee, NT6D, has sent in a few shots of his 2 x 8877 amp.

?  Editorial:  Building a 2, 8877 amplifier puzzles me.  2, 8877s incurs 
more tube cost than a single 8171 .  8877s require a higher-pressure, 
noisier blower.  A pair can do up to 5 out.  The 8171 can do 5db better - 
if need be, of course.  Not only does it have nifty handles,  it is far 
more rugged than an 8877.  Instant-on is good.  .  .  .  .  .  
>
>At the usual place:
>
>http://207.108.137.61
>
>Enjoy!
>
>73,
>
>Larry - W7IUV
>w7iuv@arrl.net
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>


-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>