>
>Actually, I subscribe to this list specifically to read the banter between
>Rich and Tom..
Without Tom, there are fewer posts. Without a protagonist and an
antagonist, this place would be downtown Snoresville.
>I have learned a great deal from the both of them - some of
>it not always good, but I wouldn't have it any other way...
>
I have learned that denial of reality is a more serious problem than I
once thought.
>However, I prefer it when the retorts include actual data and reproducible
>situations.
Amen. Ad hominem terms like ''poor science'' are vacuous. . .
>I would have to conclude that both of these individuals have
>made positive contributions to my understanding of amplifier design.
>
Have you checked out Mr. Rauch's Web site and *QST* articles?
>
cheers, Don
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Charles T Johnston [mailto:charles@ab7sl.com]
>Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 3:53 PM
>To: Terry Gaiser - W6RU; measures; AMPS
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Re: Poor Science
>
>
>
>What has really enhanced this list for me is to add a kill filter for
>Measures and Rauch. Now I get meaningful interesting posts without the
>pathetic sideshow of bruised and battered egos.
Tell us there is nothing interesting about a guy whose ego is such that
he puts himself on his list of ''recognized experts'' (9/94 QST, p.71).
>This is a great list
>when those two are filtered out.
Sounds like maybe you are still sneaking peeks at the bad boys. .
.....
cheers, Charles
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|