>
> Most home built amps use large switches that have a high enough voltage
> rating to prevent any problem - so any switch could be used. The question
> may be more difficult to answer in the SB-220. It used a receiving type
> band switch wafer. So, by using a non-progressive shorting switch to
> replace the original progressive shorting switch, the question arose
> whether the voltage rating of the switch would be exceeded. I did replace
> the original switch (which had failed) with a non progressive shorting
> switch and it has worked fine. The answer may be that I was lucky.
The SB-220 used a series 300 switch, the same as most other
commercial amplifiers with supply voltages less than 3000 volts.
The actual rating of that switch is 2.25 amperes@28VDC while
switching under power.
The current carrying capacity is 12 amperes with the contacts
used, and the rated dielectric breakdown is 1500VAC. That's hardly
a "receiving switch".
The breakdown rating was "upped" by positioning the contacts with
highest voltage away from grounded switch sections. A new switch
stands off about 4 kV peak from the ten meter contact to all other
contacts.
> For commercial manufacturers, the question may be more important than for
> homebrewers. For Heath to have used a larger bandswitch may have been
> tens of dollars increase in the cost of manufacture and could have
> represented the difference between making a profit or losing money.
The next switch up is a series 230 switch. The wholesale price was about 3
times as much.
> Otherwise, you are correct that the volts per turn in the Pi section would
> be less than in the Pi-L.
There are many cases where that statement would not be true, but
that isn't where the arc occurs anyway. It is a moot point.
> For homebuilders, it is simple. Use a big bandswitch with lots of voltage
> and current and it will not fail. For commercial manufacturers, either
> you need to put a lot more engineering into the design or take the
> Microsoft approach and design an amplifier quickly and put it out into the
> field to see what fails. After the failure points are determined, come
> out with an improved model for more money to solve the original weak
> points. And good engineering will then build newer problems into the
> "improved" amp requiring an ever further improved model.
If you wire the contacts without some thought as to voltage
differences, and especially if you don't short a portion of the unused
coil, you can make a large switch fail in a very small PA.
73, Tom W8JI
w8ji@contesting.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|