John, read the earlier posts on this thread where several of us laid
out the reasons why it threatens ham radio too.
--- "John D. Farr" <jfarr62@comcast.net> wrote:
> I guess I got to ask the question. Why do we care if they run
> linears? Seems
> to me that they are pooping in their own nests, not ours. John KC4ZXX
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger D. Johnson" <n1rj@pivot.net>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:34 PM
> Subject: [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay
>
>
> > I've noticed a bunch of obvious CB amps for auction on
> > e-Bay. I've been going through the FCC regs trying to
> > find an easy way for a non-ham to tell the difference
> > between a legal "ham" amp and one of the illegal "CB"
> > types.
> > Since 28 April 1978, amps have to be "type accepted"
> > (the old term for certificated). My Drake L-7 just has
> > a sticker saying that it's type accepted. Do later amps
> > have an FCC ID number? Some of my gear has the FCC ID
> > number some don't. What section of the regs determines
> > which equipment is required to have the number? I can
> > find all kinds of info on applying for the number, what
> > tests the gear must pass, etc. But I can find nothing
> > that clearly states what type of equipment is required
> > to have an FCC ID number or what date this all started.
> >
> > 73, Roger
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
|