Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] 3-400Z vs. 4-400A

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] 3-400Z vs. 4-400A
From: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard)
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 10:39:48 -0700
>In <200207060110.g661Amx23986@nimbus.heaven.net>, on 07/05/2002 
>   at 06:13 PM, Richard <2@mail.vcnet.com> said:
>
>>>>>Some time ago a guy told me he was substituting the
>>>>>4-400A tube in his Swan Mark 1 amplifier instead of
>>>>>using the 3-400Z tube.  He had a large supply of the
>>>>>4-400A tubes on hand and said they were working very
>>>>>well in the Swan Mark 1 even though it was designed
>>>>>around the 3-400Z tube.  Is this an ok thing to do in
>>>>>the long term?
>>>>>73,
>>>>In g-g, at 0v bias, the 4-400A needs c. 3400V to idle at the requisite 
>>>>75mA. 
>>>
>>>So add some bias already. <g>
> 
>>Adding bias to raise the ZSAC to 75mA/tube with 3000VDC would require 
>>connecting a 1A, 1 - 3 volt neg. polarity PS to the CT/cathode return. 
>
>[grumble-grouse] .  .  .   Oh, I see, a trivial task.

If I were going to the trouble, I would add c. a potted 200V/1A 
transformer in series with the extant secondary.  This would add enough 
DCV to make it fly with zero V bias.


-  R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, 
www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>