Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] QSK

To: Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] QSK
From: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:48:26 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Do you use logging SW complete with DX Spots and rig & rotor control, too?  
See, now you can filter the DX spots so you only hear the ones you need.  When 
the SW detects a spot, it will tune your rig to the frequency and turn your 
rotator so all you have to do is press a button or two (maybe three if you want 
to send a "TU" and be polite!!  :-)  ).  Then the SW will log it automatically, 
too.  So maybe if you're slick, you can completely automate it so you don't 
even have to be there.
   
  Sounds like loads of fun.

  Joe
   
  
Jim Kearman <jkearman@att.net> wrote:
  
From: "Jim Tonne" 
> 
> Gents, don't you think this QSK thing has run its course?

Some discussion on PIN QSK switches and the life expectancy of vacuum relays 
that track dots and dashes would be useful and on-topic. How are people who 
homebrew high-power HF amps handling this? 

In closing, let me say that the only way to go in a CW pileup is with a memory 
keyer. Mash the button and send your call without error. Mash another button 
and send the exchange without error (assuming you get through). The reduction 
in stress is priceless. 

73,

Jim, KR1S
http://kr1s.kearman.com/
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>