Bill,
That's exactly how I see it too.
Best,
Will
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 8/3/06 at 9:33 AM Bill Turner wrote:
>ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
>On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:20:53 +0200 (CEST), you wrote:
>
>
>>I don't know about that, since before the FCC ruling, there were plenty
>of rigs with a pair of 6146s (of various varieties) around.
>
>------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------
>
>Interesting that this should come up. I have often thought that if the
>FCC rule did not exist, there would be "exciters" with about five
>watts output and all amplifiers would use that five watts to produce
>the required output, be it 100 watts or 1500 or something in between.
>
>How much more logical that would be. People who want to run QRP would
>not have to pay for higher power and people who want higher power
>would only pay for as much as they want.
>
>Yes, I know QRP rigs are available now, but their desirability is
>limited because there are no high power amps which can use only five
>watts drive for full output. Thanks, FCC.
>
>Peter, what is the situation in the UK?
>
>Just some idle thoughts.
>
>Bill, W6WRT
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|