With the plate on, it would have been cavitating (correct name??) and
therefore run a bit faster. The previous owner may have thought that
this was a good thing and that a faster fan meant more air. Other
than that, I can't think what would possess someone to do such silly stuff.
You done good. Leave it off.
73, Alek
VK6APK
At 02:31 AM 16/10/2009, Paul Gerhardt wrote:
>Today I removed the 'retrictor plate' on the blower inlet on the Raytrack
>DX2000L that I am getting ready to put back in service.
>
>Over the 20 years that I have owned (but hardly used) the amp I have
>resolderd filament sleaves on the tubes several times. I talked to the
>designer and he said that the plate was not original so why would someone
>make this mod? After removing it I could tell there was a slight increase
>in air flow (using my hand only).
>
>Link to 'Webshots' pix of plate on and off, go to the link then hit
>'Forward' to see 4 pix of this plate.
>
>Think I will just leave it off for a while and see how it runs.
>
>Any thoughts on this possibly negative mod?
>
>http://home-and-garden.webshots.com/photo/2234661180078879011pSOrlo
>
>73,
>Paul K3PG
>
>
>
>
>--
>Paul Gerhardt
>K3PG
>http://pgerhardt.blogspot.com
>QRP ARCI 6674
>FP 274
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk
http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6py
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|