Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap.

To: "'Larry Benko'" <xxw0qe@comcast.net>, "'Frank T Brady'" <franktbrady@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap.
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Reply-to: garyschafer@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:03:07 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Yes Larry, but the conclusion drawn by the one doing the experiment was that
the current "must go thru the disk when placed in the middle". No account
for capacitance was given.

Unless I am reading this wrong the experimenter came to the wrong
conclusion.

73
Gary  K4FMX

> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Larry Benko
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 12:28 PM
> To: Frank T Brady
> Cc: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap.
> 
> Please re-read the results of the experiment.  Tests #3 and #4 did
> exactly what you  are suggesting.
> 
> Larry, W0QE
> 
> Frank T Brady wrote:
> > Gary,
> > Is anyone evaluating the test to account for the capacitance?
> > I'm sure I'm not the only one fascinated by this skin effect 'proof
> test'
> > It's beginning to sound like one of those relativity paradoxes that
> > can't be observed without the observation changing the behavior <g>
> > 73, frank w0ecs
> >
> > On 3/22/2010 12:06 PM, Gary Schafer wrote:
> >
> >> You are drawing a conclusion without knowing all the information
> needed. The
> >> disk on the antenna acts like a capacitor to the rest of the antenna.
> >> Read a little on how an antenna works. It depends upon the
> capacitance
> >> between ends for return current.
> >> Placing the disk in line only looks like a fatter element at that
> point
> >> which means more capacitance.
> >>
> >> 73
> >> Gary  k4FMX
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-
> bounces@contesting.com]
> >>> On Behalf Of pc5m, Carel
> >>> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 1:03 PM
> >>> To: amps@contesting.com
> >>> Subject: Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap.
> >>>
> >>> Bill,
> >>>
> >>> You are right !
> >>>
> >>> Changed my setup and to summarize the results:
> >>>
> >>> #1. With the disk, Fres = 480 MHz
> >>> #2. With disk connected parallel to horizontal wire (see
> >>> www.pc5m.com/skineffect2.jpg ). Fres = 260 MHz
> >>> #3. With disk connected in between (no through wire at all) ( see
> >>> www.pc5m.com/skineffect1.jpg) . Fres = 260 MHz
> >>>
> >>> I suppose I can only conclude that the RF current will/must go
> through
> >>> the
> >>> disk and not follow the long path (due to alleged skineffect) around
> the
> >>> disk.
> >>>
> >>> Again a myth busted ?
> >>>
> >>> Gl, Carel.
> >>> ---------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Try this: Measure the spacing from the bottom edge of the disk to
> the
> >>>> ground plane, then re-solder the disk at the edge of the disk,
> >>>> maintaining the same spacing. Now the disk is acting as just a
> >>>> capacitor, without having the wire's RF flowing through it.
> >>>>
> >>>> 73, Bill W6WRT
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Amps mailing list
> >>> Amps@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Amps mailing list
> >> Amps@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>