Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Solid State Relays Again

To: donroden@hiwaay.net, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Solid State Relays Again
From: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:50:08 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
But, unlike a mechanical relay, the SSR typically fails with a short  
circuit. The power supply could be energized when expected to be off. There is 
a  
bit of residual current leakage in the off state that can leave a few 
hundred  volts present on a hv power supply.
 
Of course the relay can fail with welded contacts and have the same  danger.
 
A capacitor input type filter will cause much higher current peaks (5X not  
unusual) than the average current. This makes over sizing the SSR current 
rating  very important. In addition, there are small losses that are subject 
to peak  current squared heating. At 100A and only .01 ohms,  this amounts 
to 100  watt peak power loss and the SSR does get warm. This makes attention 
to adequate  heat sinking important as well.
 
After loosing a couple of 70A rated SSR's in a 70cm kw amplifier I  went 
back to the original mechanical relays. 
 
Can someone please explain why turning on/off at a zero crossing is a  
problem? Seems that could still happen at times even with the random  on/off.
 
73,
Gerald K5GW
 
 
 
In a message dated 2/10/2014 8:58:26 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
donroden@hiwaay.net writes:

Quoting  KA4INM <ka4inm@gmail.com>:
> and an instant disconnect if the  protection circuit detects too much  
> screen current or a sharp  increase in (negative) power supply current
> (an arc) surely make them  well worth bothering with.
> -- 
>   Ron   KA4INM

If for no other reason.

Don  W4DNR


_______________________________________________
Amps  mailing  list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>