To: | Jim Hoge <knowkode@verizon.net>, amp reflector <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] triode or tetrode |
From: | Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com> |
Reply-to: | Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:18:27 -0700 (GMT-07:00) |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Here are my 3 cents worth, following Roger's 2 cents. There are maxims developed over 50 years: 1. The more complex a project is, the less likely it is to get built. 2. The power dissipation of the tube is often less restrictive than the air and power supply capability. 3. Having a pair of tubes is somewhat like having twin children - it takes extra work to know which to blame if something goes wrong (I am a twin, I know). 73, Colin K7FM _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] triode or tetrode, Roger |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] LK500ZC on WARC Band(s), tom_k1tl |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] triode or tetrode, mikea |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] triode or tetrode, Martin Sole |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |