Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" sub

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all
From: andywallace@home.com (Andy Wallace)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 09:10:43 -0600
Carl--

Guess what? My 40 antenna has a rotator on it. 40 CW was VERY quiet around 5PM
Central yesterday--plenty of bandspace available and the other ham bands had
very little CW activity as well.

Andy  K5VM

km1h@juno.com wrote:

> On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:58:58 -0600 Andy Wallace <andywallace@home.com>
> writes:
> >Carl--
> >
> >Today I worked  East Malaysia at 22:48 on 7009.8--9M6AAC--he was
> >begging for
> >calls--most of 40 CW at this time was very quiet.
>
> >Andy  K5VM
>
> >From here that would be LP at  almost due south. Any decent antenna would
> have the EU and NA QRM down in the noise. Of course that requires a site
> analysis to maximize antenna height and minimize crud.
> See the K6STI TA program for a profile of my QTH.
>
> 73  Carl  KM1H
>




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>