To: | Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Ten-Tec Centurion |
From: | R.Measures <r@somis.org> |
Date: | Thu, 11 Nov 2004 07:06:21 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
On Nov 11, 2004, at 6:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote: I just took a look at some of the emails on this subject. Saying that please pardon any repetition of anything previously mentioned. Bill --- At HF, there is unlikely to be enough be enough feedback through 0.3pF (20k-ohms at 28MHz) of anode-cathode C to support regeneration. The parasitic suppressors only eliminate VHF parasitic oscillations. In my experiences, VHF parasitic suppressors reduce the chances of having one, but they do not eliminate them. If the cut off bias is removed before the relays make solid contact for on the input an output the amplifier may momentarily oscillate. Or it may just amplify the incoming signal and if the output is not loaded (output contacts not closed quite yet) create a very large voltage across the contacts. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Ten-Tec Centurion, Ian White, G3SEK |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Ten-Tec Centurion, R . Measures |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Ten-Tec Centurion, Bill Fuqua |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Ten-Tec Centurion, Bill Fuqua |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |