kenw2dtc wrote:
> "This is very interesting, because it contradicts what I've believed:
> that the 572B offers no additional power output over the 811A unless you
> raise the plate voltage"
>
> Good question. I've included the Waters spec on the tube:
>
> http://w2dtc.com/1964-waters-572b-spec.jpg
>
> Perhaps the original Waters tube is different than the current versions
> on the market?
The mu of the Waters tube is 190 compared to 160 for the 811A. This is
what they must mean by 'higher power sensitivity'.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|
