Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] more dangers in our shack

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] more dangers in our shack
From: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:09:32 +0000
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Nils Petter Pedersen wrote:
> While I am at it... there are more dangers in our shack:
> Apart from the more obvious danger of electromagnetic overexposure
> using our 3cx 15 000's and the likes...:-)
> A lot of power tubes and other devices contain Berryllium oxide.
A lot?

The only tube I know of which has BeO in its structure is used in 
the UK Clansman 353 tank radio. This has BeO between the anode and 
a conduction cooling mounting flange. CCS1 and 8873 use a BeO 
block for the cooling path.

BeO can be dangerous, and I play very safe if I break it in a 
transistor, but I believe that prolonged exposure to a specific 
range of particle sizes is needed to lead to lung disease. The 
fumes from incineration are probably more dangerous.

Just for calrification, in a RF power transistor, the BeO is 
between the mounting flange and the leads. The white top cap is 
alumina.

Steve
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>