Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L

Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
From: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:44:08 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>

Carl wrote:
> I agree Phil, thats why I have a young girl friend.
>   
That's one of the key indicators Carl! <:-))

73

Roger (K8RI)
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>
> To: "'Carl'" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; <n8de@thepoint.net>
> Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:09 PM
> Subject: RE: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
>
>
>   
>>> Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
>>>
>>> Whats the required age to attain geezer status?
>>>
>>> Carl
>>> KM1H
>>>       
>> It is more of a state of mind, Carl!
>>
>>
>> (((73)))
>> Phil, K5PC
>>
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>   
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>