I guess there are some who make an argument even when we essentially agree.
On 7/6/12 11:02 PM, Adrian Flynn wrote:
> You are listing the "Bowtie" as Only a Digital Antenna.
> It has been and always will be one of the best antennas ever made.
>
> 73
> Adrian KF7DYU
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:09 PM, W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> I am not sure I understand your point. The bowtie is a good antenna for
>> many reasons.
>>
>>
>> On 7/6/12 10:02 PM, Adrian Flynn wrote:
>>> OK Mr. w2xj.
>>> *IF, IF* this statement of yours is* TRUE?,* then why is it that a
>> "*BOWTIE
>>> Antenna*" is the *first and best antenna for UHF reception from 1954 to
>>> 2012?*
>>>
>>> 73
>>> Adrian KF7DYU
>>> * *
>>> *
>>>
>>> *
>>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:52 PM, W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> *A bowtie is a 'digital' antenna.
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Amps mailing list
>>> Amps@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|