Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] "10 Meter Ban" to be lifted ...

To: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>,"'AMPS'" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] "10 Meter Ban" to be lifted ...
From: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:20:21 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Not that anyone on the list would really care, but running two tubes at 
legal limit should reduce
the IMD products (Splatter) if they were biased correctly. Lower efficiency 
but cleaner signal.
Naturally, your transceiver would have to have reasonable IMD to take full 
benefit of this.
73
Bill wa4lav


At 03:33 PM 10/12/2006 -0500, Robert B. Bonner wrote:

>You infact don't need to.  You do it to run illegal power.  DUH
>
>HOWEVER, a second tube will allow you to run lower power distributed across
>two tubes for heavy contesting where mistakes could be made.
>
>I always thought an amp like a Henry 5K with 3CX1200's was a very contest
>capable amp.  The 1200 is almost indestructible and a pair is bullet proof
>at reasonable power.
>
>While the 3CX1200 is a bulletproof tube, if you crank up the plate voltage
>near its maximum 5KV rating, you will run over the maximum 1200 watts plate
>dissipation.  That's the only bad thing about that setup.
>
>"Give a guy more tubes and they'll just wind up the juice."
>
>BOB DD

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>