Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] current threads about silver solder and resoldering

To: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] current threads about silver solder and resoldering
From: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:23:16 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Most things are labeled the largest component to the smallest by weight,
Such as eutectic alloy of 63% tin, 37% lead.
Oddly enough with that ratio by weight the number of atoms of each is equal.
One atom of lead to one of tin.
73
Bill wa4lav





At 07:19 PM 8/31/2012 +0000, Manfred Mornhinweg wrote:
Gene,

Unfortunately, I have occasionally seen "60/40" solder for
sale that, upon reading the SMALLER print, is 60Pb/40Sn.

I have never seen that. But of course, it might happen... We should be aware though that anyone selling "60/40" solder that contains 60% lead is a crook, because by long standing international standards the tin content is ALWAYS given first! So a solder with 60% lead and 40% tin MUST be labelled "40/60" and not "60/40".

That some hams don't know the difference between 40/60 and 60/40 solder is another matter. It happened to me, when I was starting in electronics, at age 12, and bought some 40/60 solder thinking it was the same as 60/40.

Manfred

========================
Visit my hobby homepage!
http://ludens.cl
========================
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>