Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] current threads about silver solder and resoldering

To: ampS <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] current threads about silver solder and resoldering
From: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:53:21 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Right now I am speaking of lead and tin only.
With out a uniform ratio the plastic region is extended over a broader range of temperature. This is where some material is melted and some is not on a microscopic scale. As one materials science book put it, the atoms exchange electrons and "loosely" form molecules but in a way that you can call them compounds. When the ratio is exactly 3 and the alloy is homogenous the plastic region is completely eliminated. It is more than a mixture of materials, it is an alloy. When you plate lead and tin on a PC board it is not an alloy it has to be fused, melted, so that the materials can diffuse though each other to become a homogenous alloy.
  I did not say that all integer ratios are eutectic, only 3.


At 04:15 PM 9/2/2012 +0000, you wrote:
Bill,

I recalled that the ratios of lead and tin atoms had to be an integer
to for the lowest melting point.

But that's not right either! I hate to be so overly teacherish in this thread, but facts remain facts!

In all possible compositions of tin-lead alloys, only one single ratio is eutectic. Exact ratios of atoms such as 1:1, 2:1, 1:2, are NOT eutectic, and fully melt at a higher temperature than the eutectic mix.

Have a look at these two web pages for more detailed information, or google for phase diagrams of tin lead solders or other alloys.

http://www.ami.ac.uk/courses/topics/0244_tsm/index.html

http://spaceflight.esa.int/impress/text/education/Solidification/Phase_Diagrams.html

Note that the eutectic point of tin-lead is given as 61.9/38.1, rather than the conventional 63/37. That's why there is so much 60/40 solder around. The 63/37 solder is only marginally better. The reason to use 63/37 rather than 61.9/38.1 is in the inability to make an absolutely homogeneous alloy, and the fact that the pasty phase is shorter if the mix deviates from the eutectic point toward the tin side, then if it does toward the lead side. So, if the tolerance of an alloy happens to be 2%, it's likely that a nominal 63/37 mix will statistically end up having a shorter pasty range than a nominal 61.9/38.1 mix.

Manfred

========================
Visit my hobby homepage!
http://ludens.cl
========================
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>