Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:44:26 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On 2/22/2013 8:23 PM, Carl wrote:
I can just picture todays crop of hams changing tank coils (-;  It might
improve the gene pool tho....

Might be incentive for those remaining to learn at least basic electronics...Nah, this is the entitlement generation.

The survivors would expect the electrons to learn their lesson and the family would expect a large settlement from the manufacturer for making such a dangerous device.

73

Roger (K8RI)



Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- From: "peter chadwick" <g8on@fsmail.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency



Another way is to abandon the pi network and run them in push-pull:
this was how quite high efficiencies were obtained on the higher bands
'in the good old days' admittedly, in Class C. That wouldn't be
difficult in GG, either - you could use  transmission line
transformers to get push pull drive.
73
Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1430 / Virus Database: 2639/5623 - Release Date: 02/22/13


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>