Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] FW: Power factor correction on tube amps

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] FW: Power factor correction on tube amps
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:21:24 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On 3/9/2013 5:05 PM, peter chadwick wrote:

Strictly, ISO 9000 registartion means that you have the paperwork and the parts 
should meet the spec. Once you put self -certification to a published 
Harmonised Standard in the loop, it should, in theory, mean the product meets 
the standard.
NOTE THAT I SAY "IN THEORY"!

Only if you specifically say so in the documentation.

Product specs in the ISO doc are getting a bit too specific. , which was the main problem the auditors said they ran into.

ISO docs mainly describe the work process and record keeping in detail, but not the product itself.

At most you might refer to the product spec sheet, but not if the ID changed ever time it was updated.

All, and I have to emphasize the "all" being ISO compliant means is you have the documentation in place that accurately describes what you are doing.

As was mentioned, even then there is no gurantee that company is following its own docs. OTOH if they get caught they may have a hard time getting re-certified and that is expensive as well as hard on their reputation.

73

Roger (K8RI)
73 Roger (K8RI)


Me? Cynical? What me?
(Now look for a comment from GM3SEK!)
73
Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps




_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>