To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" |
From: | Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick) |
Date: | Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:17:53 -0000 |
>Just because you are >transmitting a lot of bits in your sense doesn't mean you are communicating a >lot of intelligence. You only need to turn on the TV set to see the truth of that! I count a dot or a space (equal length to a dot) as one bit. The standard word to use for calculating speed is PARIS, which counts as 46 bits. 73 Peter G3RZP. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all, Rich Measures |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] ARRL and QST, John Fielding |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all, Rich Measures |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code", Michael Tope |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |