To: | "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>, <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] QSK |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net> |
Date: | Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:43:43 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: At 08:12 AM 2/23/2006, Jim Tonne wrote: >Gents, don't you think this QSK thing has run its course? >We all know the pros and the cons. Its an individual thing >and the choice will be driven in a lot of cases by the >equipment which is available and by the opinion of the >individual involved. I suggest we shut this down and get >on with more constructive things. > >- Jim WB6BLD ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ People will stop talking about it when they are through. If you're not interested, please just delete the message and move on. This reflector is for everybody, not just you. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Filter capacitor values, TexasRF |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] QSK, Keith Dutson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] QSK, Jim Tonne |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] QSK, k7rdx |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |