To add to the recommendations, Pi-L is excellent.
On the toroid, 3 words of caution:
1. The power dissipation comments below are exactly right. The toroid will
heat up. And you want to keep the heat down because the toroid
characteristics change quite dramatically at higher temps. So mount the
toroid where A) there is air circulating around the toroid and B) do **NOT**
block the center of the toroid with mounting hardware - the max heat point
of the toroid will be in the center.
2. For the same flux limit reasons, dedicate a single toroid to each band.
So that the turns can be equally spaced and spread around the entire
circumference of the toroid. I made the mistake of sharing the 40/80m
toroid on one band - and when operating on 40m, the local heating under the
40m part of the toroid is extreeme. And the amp's efficiencies suffer as
well for that. Especially in RTTY service which is my favorite mode. I
will revise that design and dedicate a single toroid to each band.
3. Run the tank Q lower, rather than higher. The heating and loss and
voltage problems are quite a lot less with a Q=8 than a Q=12. And the
difference in 3rd order harmonic levels is almost zero. On paper, higher Q
is nicer, but in the practical real world, a lower Q has many benefits -
easier tank construction, less heating, less arc potential - and (for
contest cases) a lower Q allows a greater frequency change before touch-up
retuning is required.
There are many other guys on the board with far far more experience than I
and I defer to their comments. But these items above are lessons learned
the hard way with my first amp build. Hope your build will be smoother than
mine was!
Best of luck and happy new year.
73/jeff/ac0c
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Karl-Arne Markström" <sm0aom@telia.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 1:16 PM
To: "Ulf Tjerneld" <star@frizon.org>; <Amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] L section of Pi-L filter
> 1. Toroids have to be quite heavily dimensioned, as
> they are storing a lot of magnetic energy in a small space.
> At an L-network Q of 2 they have to store at least 2000 VAr in the toroid
> magnetic material, and the corresponding flux density is quite high.
>
> Even the largest iron-power toroids available may be marginal in this
> application, as the core losses for i.a. #2 material are in the 10's of
> watts range.
>
> 2. Using "reasonable" network Q:s, the current in the L-network part is
> about 80 - 90% of the current flowing in the Pi-part, so the same wire
> gauges are required.
>
> The "Pi-L Designer" utility by Jim Tonne is a very useful tool for output
> circuit design, together with the DL5SWB Mini Ring Core calculator.
>
> 73/
>
> Karl-Arne
> SM0AOM
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ulf Tjerneld" <star@frizon.org>
> To: <Amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 7:33 PM
> Subject: [Amps] L section of Pi-L filter
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Question 1: I'm considering using toroids in the L-section of my RF tank.
>> Are there any guidelines regarding suitable cores, wires and turns?
>>
>> Question 2: If I stay with a traditional air wound coil for the L-section
>> what would be a suitable wire diameter for a 1 KW amp? I'm pretty sure it
>> does not have to be the same heavy gauge as in the Pi-section!
>>
>> Thanks for any answer!
>>
>> 73's Ulf /SM0NOR
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.127/2603 - Release Date:
> 01/06/10
> 08:35:00
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|