Re: [Amps] RG6 Power Handling

["Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>]

Not very flexible.

Low power circuits can use RG-174 or 178.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Larry Benko" <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] RG6 Power Handling


> RG-142 (50 ohm)
>
> Same size as RG-58 and rated at 30MHz 1:1 SWR of 3.1KW average power
>
> Larry, W0QE
>
> On 6/19/2014 10:22 AM, Manfred Mornhinweg wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > what 50Ω coax cable would be recommended for the internal wiring of a 
> > compact 160-10m legal limit amplifier? I'm looking for a cable thinner 
> > than RG-8, much more flexible, non-foam (to avoid de-centering in bends), 
> > and that can be purchased easily in small quantities. Of course, it must 
> > handle the power, even with a slightly elevated SWR, without overheating.
> > Suggestions are welcome!
> >
> > Manfred
> >
> >
> > ========================
> > Visit my hobby homepage!
> > http://ludens.cl
> > ========================
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3972/7706 - Release Date: 06/19/14
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps