Since most transmitters have a coax connector output referenced to chassis
ground. Say that chassis
Is not grounded. Some of the energy will show up as a voltage between
chassis and ground. I prefer my energy located between the center conductor
of my coax and the inside of the coax shield.
To reduce this voltage offset a good ground reference is required. Also,
lightning, since it is God's RF pulse needs a good path to where it is
going. A poor path results in lots of voltage across that path. To keep
God's system happy and the ham radio system happy a low Q low Z ground is
required.
Multiple connections and heavy connections make both systems happy. OH yea
your insurance co loses their excuse to pay if you ever get hit.
-----Original Message-----
From: R.Measures [mailto:r@somis.org]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:04 AM
To: Bill Turner
Cc: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Dedicated 220AC Wiring for Amps..
On Oct 13, 2005, at 9:03 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
> At 01:51 PM 10/13/2005, monty taylor wrote:
>
>> As a result I will RF ground outside my
>> windows today as I already have the 8 foot rod ready to go.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I shake my head whenever I hear the term "RF ground" in the sense of
> running a ground wire to "get rid" of stray RF. Here's why:
>
> 1. You can't simply run a wire to "ground" RF in the first place.
> That ground wire you are installing is a significant portion of a
> wavelength at HF. On 10 meters, for example, an eight foot wire is
> approximately 1/4 wavelength. If it is "grounded" at one end, the
> other end is an open circuit. You have "grounded" nothing at all. At
> lower frequencies, the effect is less pronounced because the portion
> of a wavelength is less, but that ground wire never completely
> "grounds" your equipment.
Well put, Bill.
>
> 2. Even if you could "ground" your stray RF, why should you? RF
> energy is expensive to generate. Do you really want to run that
> expensive RF energy into dirt? Does dirt help your signal?
With a Hertz antenna (end-fed half-wave) ground loss is a factor --
albeit a small one.
>
> 3. When you have RF in the shack, you do not have a grounding
> problem, you have an antenna problem. Almost always, the source of
> the RF in the shack is unbalance in the antenna system (including the
> feedline), and that's what you should be fixing, not "grounding" the
> RF to get rid of it.
Amen
>
> 4. For coax-fed antennas, the easiest cure in nearly all cases is to
> install a 1:1 balun in the feedline, usually right at the point where
> the coax connects to the antenna.
A coax-choke balun (a.k.a. "Ugly Balun") at the center feedpoint of a
dipole fixes this problem.
> It is also possible that the
> physical layout of the coax is causing unbalance by picking up part
> of the antenna's field on the coax shield. Relocate the coax so it is
> physically balanced with respect to the antenna.
>
> For those of you who'd prefer to go on "grounding" your RF, I hope
> you have lots of patience in the pileups. You'll be needing it. :-)
chortle
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|