Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Hole Flow

To: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Hole Flow
From: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 18:31:07 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
   It is interesting that in the "Now You're Talking" books from the ARRL, they 
tried to
avoid arrows showing direction of current flow in their simple illustrations of 
parallel and
series circuits. 
   I often find myself having to correct myself from time to time when going 
from explaining
how electrons flow thru conductors to illustrations of simple circuit analysis. 
I grew up in
both worlds. 
   I have always believed that a good electrical engineer must first be a good 
technician.
73
Bill wa4lav

________________________________________
From: Amps [amps-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of Bill Turner 
[dezrat1242@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2013 2:01 PM
To: Amps
Subject: Re: [Amps] Hole Flow

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:          (may be snipped)

On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 03:07:06 +0000, Bill F. wrote:

>  However, physics, and engineering text used conventional current flow when
>analyzing circuits.

REPLY:

If there is anything an engineer hates, it is to be wrong. They are paid to
be right and will fight to the death over a concept rather than admit an
error.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>