Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L

To: Carl <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>, Amplifier Reflector <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
From: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 04:56:01 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
No man can be truly happy with only 1 amp. Who many do you have Carl ??

73, Dick, W1KSZ

> From: km1h@jeremy.mv.com
> To: w1ksz@q.com; amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 22:02:57 -0400
> 
> He asked which ONE to keep.
> 
> If 160 is important then that eliminates the SB-220.  If it was my pick Id 
> keep the LK-500 and convert to a regular tune amp. Ive been runing a 
> straight LK-500ZC since the mid 80's and it hasnt burped yet.
> 
> Carl
> KM1H
> 
> 
> 
> Carl
> KM1H
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "RICHARD SOLOMON" <w1ksz@q.com>
> To: "Amplifier Reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 9:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
> 
> 
> >
> > All things being equal ... they all work ... I would sell the Clipperton 
> > L.
> > Reasoning being; the SB-220 and LK-500 use the same tubes. That
> > reduces your cost for spare tubes.
> >
> > 73, Dick, W1KSZ
> >
> >> From: CAA357@aol.com
> >> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:51:17 -0400
> >> To: amps@contesting.com
> >> Subject: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
> >>
> >> Opinions wanted:
> >>
> >> Today I adopted yet another amplifier in my small formidable shack and 
> >> that
> >>  is really two too many hi hi. I want to lighten my load however, I  am
> >> trying to decide which amplifier to keep.
> >>
> >> Give the selection between: SB-220 with all of the Harbach upgrades,
> >> Clipperton L with new power supply board and recently acquired AMP-Supply
> >> LK500-NTC looks mint however not yet tested.  How would you rate each of 
> >> these
> >> amps and which one would you keep?
> >>
> >> I look forward to your input.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> De KA2QWC
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Amps mailing list
> >> Amps@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 
> 
                                          
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>