Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 8877 amp- to ground fil ct or not?

To: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 8877 amp- to ground fil ct or not?
From: MU 4CX250B <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 16:46:22 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I agree with Bill. There’s no problem grounding the CT of the filament
xfmr (and bypassing the fil leads at the tube socket), but I prefer
keeping the cathode isolated,  and dedicated to the B-  return. You
don’t want to ground the cathode, except to monitor grid current.
73,
Jim

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 6, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> ------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
>
>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 13:08:14 -0700, N6CFH wrote:
>>
>>
>> Asking for current thoughts on grounding the filament CT on 8877. Have seen
>> both ways utilized.
>>
>> How about connecting cathode to one filament lead? Again, have seen it both
>> ways.
>
> REPLY:
>
> As you say, both ways work so I believe the best practice is to leave
> the heater "floating" i.e. not connected to the cathode. This avoids
> the need for a bifilar choke in the heater leads in a cathode driven
> (grounded grid) design.
>
> The only drawback to this is the possibility of the tube developing a
> cathode to heater short which would disrupt the input impedance, to
> say the least.  The 8877 has plenty of insulation between the cathode
> and heater and this should never be a problem.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>