Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna

To: w2xj@w2xj.net
Subject: Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna
From: Adrian Flynn <adrianjamesflynn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 23:02:35 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
You are listing the "Bowtie" as Only a Digital Antenna.
It has been and always will be one of the best antennas ever made.

73
Adrian KF7DYU
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:09 PM, W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

> I am not sure I understand your point. The bowtie is a good antenna for
> many reasons.
>
>
> On 7/6/12 10:02 PM, Adrian Flynn wrote:
> > OK Mr. w2xj.
> > *IF, IF* this statement of yours is* TRUE?,* then why is it that a
> "*BOWTIE
> > Antenna*" is the *first and best antenna for UHF reception from 1954 to
> > 2012?*
> >
> > 73
> > Adrian KF7DYU
> > * *
> > *
> >
> > *
> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:52 PM, W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> >> *A bowtie is a 'digital' antenna.
> >> *
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>