| To: | Amps group <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow |
| From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:32:05 +0000 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped) On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:22:01 +0000 (UTC), you wrote: >he speed of light. > >73, >Cathy >N5WVR REPLY: Being a rather skeptical bunch here, we need a bit more convincing. How do you know? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Jim Garland |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Jim Garland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |