| To: | Amps group <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow |
| From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Dec 2016 05:03:45 +0000 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped) On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:16:50 -0700, Jim wrote: > The current flow, which is in the reverse direction, isn't a real substance. I REPLY: Nonsense. Electric current is just as real as current in a river and rivers don't flow uphill. River current is the flow of water molecules, electric current is the flow of electrons. Why are you making it so difficult? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Bill Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] FW: "Conventional" current flow, Fuqua, Bill L |
| Previous by Thread: | [Amps] FW: "Conventional" current flow, Fuqua, Bill L |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Al Kozakiewicz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |