To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [Amps] (fwd) Re: Heathkit Copyright |
From: | ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk |
Date: | Wed, 19 May 2010 18:35:57 -0400 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
On Wed, 19 May 2010 03:45:11 +0000, Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com> wrote: > "Kleenix" was denied copyright with the argument that the word had entered > the language to such a thorough extent as to no longer just refer to one > branded product. He fell asleep at the wheel and drifted over into the trademarks lane :-) I suggest regulating the screen voltage tightly to reduce third order IMD. Tony _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Heath copyright, Roger |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] (fwd) Re: Heathkit Copyright, Roger |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Heath copyright, john . brewer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] (fwd) Re: Heathkit Copyright, Roger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |