Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Acceptable SWR for Tube Amps

To: Lukasz <sp4it.mail@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Acceptable SWR for Tube Amps
From: John Lyles <jtml@losalamos.com>
Reply-to: jtml@losalamos.com
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:08:38 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
The screen current will certainly vary if the tube load resistance is changed. Its often best to look for screen I max for best tuning, instead of a plate current dip. But as for it being momentary, no, it is an average screen current that moves slowly as indicated by a meter.

73

John K5PRO

On 2/19/25 8:05 AM, Lukasz wrote:


On Wed, 19 Feb 2025, 06:09 John Lyles, <jtml@losalamos.com> wrote:

    (...)

    Anyway, this is how i think about these things. And, as stated
    below, if
    you go too far off normal, the components in the matching network
    are no
    longer able to compensate to bring the real part of the impedance
    to the
    optimal point of the tube for a given plate voltage and power. That,
    along with the reactance that gets transformed back to the tube,
    are all
    bad things, tube or transistor. But how far is bad, requires doing
    the
    math of calculating the circulating currents and voltages.


This explains why we (owners of this amp -it is very popular in Poland , Russia and some other countries) can get away with tuning it for let's say 3.7MHz and use it on entire 80m (which ends at 3.8MHz here on the high end). All of the Pi tank elements are massively oversized. To the point where people replace the factory 1500W output tube with up to 5kW tubes and run it successfully . But it also explains why the original tubes have a reputation for being "finicky"and "easy to break" in sone circles and many replace them with two pentodes like GU81m (which they then run at double the datasheet power). While the Pi tank can definitely take it the tube is another story. If it's run at 1000W I think it's going to be fine most of the time ..but let's say we run it at 1800W (as people do). Then we go to the very end of 80m when tuned sonewhere in the beginning....


There is one more variable. This amplifier as it comes from the factory contains the preamp and the coupling between the two is tuned. I found this coupling is the first thing that limits the output power (at same drive level) if I stray quite far from the original tuning frequency .

The most popular modification of this amp is to remove that preamp completely and drive the final tube through a small attenuator with 30W.( I drive it with 200mW)

I can definitely see how all of this together is a recipe for broken tubes.

You mentioned higher momentary currents and voltages , depending on where we are in the AC cycle. I wonder if this could also create high momentary screen currents that could not show on the meter nor trigger the protection because of how brief they are.

Very interesting . These amps were made for the military/TV service. There they would have 10 frequencies programmed and they would sit at 100% output on one of them never straying a dozen KHz away (usually FM was the modulation of choice but linearity was very important because the signal they sent was a dozen telephone channels, maybe some data too. They wanted as low IMD as possible ). It is only in our amateur use they started to be used this way.

73, Łukasz



    73

    John

    K5PRO


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>