| To: | "Peter Chadwick" <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] why not graphite anodes? |
| From: | R.Measures <r@somis.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Sep 2005 06:18:45 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
On Sep 29, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Peter Chadwick wrote: > Rich said > >> In pulse service. 3-500Zs offer virtually no advantage over 3-400Zs. > > Electrically, this almost certainly true. But how about price and > availability? The issue is about changing out good 3-400Zs for 3-500Zs. > > 73 > > Peter G3RZP > > > > > > Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Amps] fl7000, Tim O'Rourke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] Emtorn DX3 problem, Lon W. Cottingham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] why not graphite anodes?, Peter Chadwick |
| Next by Thread: | [Amps] LaPort text, John T. M. Lyles |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |