Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] QSK

To: jkearman@att.net (Jim Kearman)
Subject: Re: [Amps] QSK
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:11:07 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On Feb 23, 2006, at 8:27 AM, Jim Kearman wrote:

>
> From: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>
>>
>> Gents, don't you think this QSK thing has run its course?
>
> Some discussion on PIN QSK switches and the life expectancy of vacuum 
> relays that track dots and dashes would be useful and on-topic. How 
> are people who homebrew high-power HF amps handling this?
>
To make sure that a Cu-contact vacuum relay survives, one must be sure 
that it makes before RF arrives.

> In closing, let me say that the only way to go in a CW pileup is with 
> a memory keyer. Mash the button and send your call without error. Mash 
> another button and send the exchange without error (assuming you get 
> through). The reduction in stress is priceless.
>
> 73,
>
> Jim, KR1S
> http://kr1s.kearman.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>

Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734.  www.somis.org

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>