| To: | "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques |
| From: | "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | dezrat1242@yahoo.com |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:12:35 -0700 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:08:06 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote: >The comment I most remember from the Eimac engineer is that >Measures was responsible for more destoyed 8877's than all other sources >combined since the tube came out. REPLY: That is quite a remarkable statement. Before you besmirch Rich's reputation any further, can you back up your statement with names, dates and facts? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques, Bill, W6WRT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Design VS parasitic, Bill, W6WRT |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques, Carl |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques, Carl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |