To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [Amps] 3-400z status |
From: | "John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov> |
Date: | Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:17:28 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
>Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:16:51 -0600 >To: "R. Measures" <r@somis.org> >From: "John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov> >Subject: Re: [Amps] why not graphite anodes? >Cc: >Bcc: >X-Attachments: > >>In pulse service. 3-500Zs offer virtually no advantage over 3-400Zs. > >This has nothing to electrical performance, only because of supply of 3-400Zs. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] why not graphite anodes?, Carcia, Francis A HS |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] why not graphite anodes?, Peter Chadwick |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] TMC PAL-350 or PAL-500 interconnecting cable?, Karl-Arne Markström |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] Two Tone Generator, wc6w@juno.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |