Antennaware
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Antennaware] Very Low Dipole Radiation Resistance

To: Dave Cuthbert <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Antennaware] Very Low Dipole Radiation Resistance
From: Edward Mccann via Antennaware <antennaware@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Edward Mccann <edwmccann@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:23:44 -0700
List-post: <mailto:antennaware@contesting.com>
Noting that the Rr varies as a function of height above ground.

AG6CX

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 17, 2019, at 7:38 AM, Dave Cuthbert <telegrapher9@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Gedas,
> 
> you are correct. The reported resistive part of the input impedance is the
> short dipole is the radiation resistance.
> 
>   Dave KH6AQ, formerly WX7G
> 
>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 7:47 AM Gedas <w8bya@mchsi.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Wondering if someone can confirm that by setting my model to zero wire
>> losses, use a perfect ground, and eliminating any & all loads that the
>> resistive portion of the displayed source impedance should be very close
>> to the R(rad) of the dipole.
>> 
>> Gedas, W8BYA
>> 
>> Gallery at http://w8bya.com
>> Light travels faster than sound....
>> This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Antennaware mailing list
>> Antennaware@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/antennaware
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Antennaware mailing list
> Antennaware@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/antennaware
_______________________________________________
Antennaware mailing list
Antennaware@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/antennaware

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>