To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time that the contest sponsors officially identify SCP as "assisted?" |
From: | "Yuri VE3XB" <ve3xb@rogers.com> |
Reply-to: | ve3xb@rogers.com |
Date: | Wed, 2 Dec 2015 22:31:47 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Years back during a contest at our club station we had a special guy who was checking dupes (remember those huge lined sheets marked ABCD... 123...?) I also remember doing it by myself and that was a hardship! So when logging programs took dupe checking over that was a great relief. I don't think that using SCP provides more "assistance" than a logger doing this hideous job for us. Should using loggers for this purpose also be considered as -(A)? And the last - how much SCP will help to distinguish between VE3XD and VE3XB? 73 Yuri VE3XB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Fwd: 20th Stew Perry TopBand DX Challange, Lew Sayre |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time that the contest sponsors officially identify SCP as "assisted?", Ed Muns |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time that the contest sponsors officially identify SCP as "assisted?", Paul O'Kane |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time that the contest sponsors officially identify SCP as "assisted?", Jim Lawrence |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |