CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation
From: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:08:39 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
That is true of course, but we do seem to improve our scores at KL7RA when
we sacrifice a goat.

Don't see anything in the rules against that.

73
Steve KL7SB


-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Voelpel
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:40 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation

Primarly it is who has the best location and most advanced station.

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
4O3A
Sent: Donnerstag, 16. März 2017 12:22
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation

Advanced SO operating is skill based. I know many contesters who are not
capable to run SO2R at all. They are not competitive any more.
We are competing who has better skill. 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>