I think you are right. Having participated in FD in 2A for both 2005 and
2006, I would say (without analyzing the logs) that 1D participation was up
quite a bit this year. Our club had less participants this year so perhaps
those that did not show up decided to stay at home and play there.
OTOH, I do not think the rules should be changed to eliminate D stations
from making a run. It just seems not to be fair.
73, Keith NM5G
NARS/TDXS FD2006 Coordinator
http://www.tdxs.org/
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Art Boyars
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6:22 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] FD observations and suggestion
As I suspect is true for many of us, Field Day was my first contest -- three
75W, xtal controlled, teen-aged Novices comprising the entire 15M CW crew
for W3RCN in 1961; 13 QSOs in 24 hours. ("FD is not a contest," you and the
ARRL say? So then why does the ARRL web site list the FD scores under the
"Contests" link?)
With family and work commitments, I have not operated FD in many years;
maybe since K1JX and I won the 1B-battery class around 1979 or '80 (N4BP
shattered our QSO total the next year). This year I decided to get on
spare-time from home "Class 1D" just to have some fun and to give the "real"
FD stations some contacts. (And it was sort of a FD operation. One of the
antenna support ropes broke while I was out of town during the week, and I
fixed it late Friday afternoon.)
Observation #1: I was not alone. There were many people in Class D, many
of them calling CQ FD. Even I called CQ for a few minutes until: a) I kept
getting answered by zero-point Class D stations; b) I decided that it was
"against the spirit of Field Day" for Class D to call CQ. (Note also that
if you are S&P in Class D, you do not know the CQer is Class D until you
work him.)
Observation #2: My signal is just as weak in FD as in SS. (Does that mean
I fixed the antenna properly?)
Observation #3. Phone still stinks. (That's not the word K3IU and I used
at a PVRC meeting many years ago, but it will do for a family reflector.)
Observation #4: FD is, indeed, a great opportunity to help operators
increase their skills. Especially the moderately loud one I worked on
40SSB:
"Roger and thank you and 73's ... uhhh ... QRZed Field Day from WnYZQ,
Whiskey Number n Yellow Ziggurat Quoit... Field Day QRZed."
Me (in a little pile-up): "Kaay Thrreee Killooowwattt Uuuniitted"
Them: "Uhhh K 3 Kilowatt United??"
Me: "Roger! K 3 Kilowatt United!"
Them: "OK... K 3 Kilowatt United." [Then, ... silence. What?? They want
me to go first?!?! OK.]
Me: "Number Onnne Delllta in Maarryylaand"
Them: "Roger the 1 Delta in Maryland. We're number nA in xxxx.... nA in
xxxx. QSL??"
Me: "QSL, thank you!"
Them: "Roger and thank you and 73's ... uhhh ... QRZed Field Day ...."
And on and on. They were running people, but for every QSO they had the
answering station go first. What a teaching opportunity!
And finally, my suggestion: The Rules already say that Class D stations do
not get credit for working each other. I think the intent is to maintain
the "emergency exercise" spirit of FD, and I agree. From my Observation #1,
I suggest that Class D stations should also not be allowed to solicit
contacts ("call CQ", in the vernacular). Even beyond maintaining the spirit
of FD, I think that without this rule change, a few dozen big Class D
operations could turn FD into their own NAQP, just without the multipliers.
What do you think?
73, Art K3KU
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|