I missed the event but my slantical is cut for 1830 and the SWR curve is
pretty small. I am sure many others are in the same boat. I thought there
were a bunch of nets above 1900.
Was there something wrong with the bottom 30khz of the band? You can sure
cram a lot of CW signals in 30Khz.
We got into this debate on 40m after the CQ SSB contest. It didn't go very
far.
A few hours of intense activity should easily be tolerated.
Just one guys opinion.
Mike W0MU
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Roger Parsons
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 8:36 AM
To: Contest
Subject: [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB 160m
Some of you will know I am a contester, although almost exclusively on CW. I
am also a 160m DXer.
I was very disappointed last evening to hear many NAQP stations operating on
SSB at well below 1840kHz, and a couple below 1830kHz. There is no need for
this in a purely domestic NA contest where we all have access to the full
200kHz of the band. During several sweeps I only detected two stations
operating above 1900kHz, and the centre of activity was clearly
1835-1870kHz.
Why?
I understand and accept that during major international contests the whole
of the band will be used for SSB, but do feel that this contest could, and
should, be operated in accordance with the accepted band plan.
73 Roger
VE3ZI
___________________________________________________________
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" -
The Wall Street Journal http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|