CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics
From: "Lance" <jlhoffman@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:03:16 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Amen!  I've been penalized because "they" entered NW0L or KN0L, etc!
I got their calls correctly, why should I be penalized for their mistake(s)?

73, WN0L


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <K3BU@aol.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics


> In a message dated 8/1/2005 7:38:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
k9gx@n4gn.com
> writes:
>
>
> >>Fortunately beyond just making the Qs one must copy and log calls and
> exchanges correctly.<<
>
> ...and pray that other people log YOU correctly, don't delete you from
their
> log (M/S "timing thing"), they don't press wrong key or computer doesn't
wipe
> bunch of QSOs or you will be punished with 4 QSO's removal "to punish you
for
> sloppy logging and teach you a lesson how to log properly".
> Isn't it time to remove this 3 QSO "penalty" stuff?
> It was meant to punish those who left the dupes in their old paper logs,
when
> you had the control over duping and it was justified then, but now?
>
> 73 Yuri
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>