> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Geiger
> Sent: January 24, 2007 15:39
> To: Tom Wagner; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend
>
>
> --- Tom Wagner <tfwagner@snet.net> wrote:
>
> > Re check digits and other "unenforced rules"...
> >
> >
> > It's really pretty simple, and practical.
> > The ARRL is more interested in encouraging participation than
> > enforcing rules that don't affect the outcome.
>
>
> So instead of sending a consectutive serial number, which can
> take more time in sending, would it be ok for me to give
> everyone 100 as a serial number, cut to ATT? As long as I
> log that as the sent number for each QSO in the log, it
> shouldn't affect the outcome in any way.
>
Wow.
All the rules I have seen for contests using serial numbers as part of the
exchange stipulate "consecutive" or "progressive" serial numbers. That is a
defined rule.
73 -- Paul VO1HE
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|