| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet |
| From: | "Yuri VE3DZ" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net> |
| Reply-to: | Yuri VE3DZ <ve3dz@rigexpert.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:08:26 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I don't like Dx Cluster, but the reality is - like it or not - almost everyone is using it nowadays, one way or another. I mean 99.9 % of the HAM stations have the capability of using Dx Cluster today. So, why not just allow it for all categories, like it was done for WAE or Russian DX long time ago? What are we afraid of here? Yuri VE3DZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Microsoft Virtual PC - multiple operating systems, Dave Hachadorian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Microsoft Virtual PC - multiple operating systems, Robert Brandon |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet, Dennis OConnor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet, Randy Thompson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |