CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest]Packet or not

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest]Packet or not
From: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:06:33 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Jim makes an excellent point, and that is only one example.  Packet is
not for everyone, but for some it's just peachy.  It's why they make
chocolate and vanilla.  Dallas W3PP

> Bill, I had limited time to operate this weekend, but wanted to maximize
> the number of points I could make for my club.  Packet was a
> godsend!  Sunday morning I went downstairs to bring some chairs upstairs,
> checked the spots and worked 12 QSOs in 11 minutes, 11 of them new
> multipliers.  All off of packet, of course.
>
> I am still convinced of the value of packet, and am firmly in favor of
> keeping two single-op categories, one with packet and one without.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C

---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>